At Sat Nov 15 16:34:09 2003, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> Martin
>
> Thanks for the response. It lead to another question
>
> If I'm using Anomy (as I am) do I need to keep a copy of the raw
> original or undo the anomy defang'ing?
I don't know anything about Anomy. I'd say that you'll need to
dford
Sent: 15 November 2003 14:07
To: Alan Munday
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA-Learn. Clarification question.
At Fri Nov 14 23:03:42 2003, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> Having just read the FAQ's can I just check the requirements for the
> source SPAM/HAM mail for sa-lea
At Fri Nov 14 23:03:42 2003, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> Having just read the FAQ's can I just check the requirements for the
> source SPAM/HAM mail for sa-learn?
>
> Do the contents of the sources messages need to be false positives
> for the HAM file and false negatives for the SPAM file?
No. To w
Having just read the FAQ's can I just check the requirements for the source
SPAM/HAM mail for sa-learn?
Do the contents of the sources messages need to be false positives for the
HAM file and false negatives for the SPAM file?
I can see that I'll be able to assemble 200 false negatives easily, h
