Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.43 + Razor

2002-12-23 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:14:53AM -0800, Dianne Marie Montesa wrote: > isnt RAZOR_CHECK set to zero by default? i dont have > it on my configs. and it doesnt check razor. > > just checking =) :) Nope, why would it be disabled by default? full RAZOR_CHECKeval:check_razor1() describe RA

Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.43 + Razor

2002-12-23 Thread Dianne Marie Montesa
isnt RAZOR_CHECK set to zero by default? i dont have it on my configs. and it doesnt check razor. just checking =) dianne > > The errors indicate that spamd found the Razor1 and > Razor2 modules, > but had problems actually running stuff. > > If you want to disable Razor completely, set the >

Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.43 + Razor

2002-12-22 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 08:25:43AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I am running SA 2.43 installed via CPAN on FreeBSD. I do not intend > to integrate Vipul's Razor. Anyway I see something in my logs that > makes me think I should add some config option somewhere to disable > the Razor stuff: >

[SAtalk] SA-2.43 + Razor

2002-12-22 Thread Odhiambo Washington
I am running SA 2.43 installed via CPAN on FreeBSD. I do not intend to integrate Vipul's Razor. Anyway I see something in my logs that makes me think I should add some config option somewhere to disable the Razor stuff: Dec 23 00:15:10 ns2 spamd[73654]: razor2 check skipped: No such file or direc