At Thu Nov 27 22:06:18 2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
>
> Hi Shayne,
>
> Way ahead of you:
>
> http://mrtg.orourke.ca/firewall/cpu.html
>
> The yearly graph will show you when I first installed SA back in
> September. The realy ugly flatline's are since Tuesday. These were
> the periods today where
the issue.
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shayne Lebrun
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Run Away SA...
>
>
>
> Step 1:
> Install onto ser
ant to see some examples of my own pretty
graphs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan
Tappin
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 1:43 PM
To: Robert A. Hayden
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Run Away SA...
I tried skipping the rbl
hard
reboot is required.
This system has 700+ MB or RAM.
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert A. Hayden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:35 AM
> To: Dan Tappin
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Run Away SA...
>
Make sure RBL is disabled.
skip_rbl_checks 1
also, execute spamd (you are using spamd, right?) using the -m flag and
make sure that number is high enough. I use -m25 and handle about 50k
messages/week with no problem.
Also, memory is critical on a system. If you are below 256mb, it c
I have a 2.6 SA installation that has recently started to take off process wise.
SA starts and then runs normally for 5 to 10 minutes then the processes start to pile
up. I get 10 to 15 spamd processes spawning
and they soon consume all the system resources and eventually hangs the machine.
't
