RE: [SAtalk] Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam

2003-12-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
Another pattern I notice is that the plain text part always has 3 lines of random words, all lower case, no punctuation except apostrophe in the contractions. Some have a blank line (one space) before the 3 lines of text. Maybe we could add a low-valued body rule for that pattern? The HTML part

RE: [SAtalk] Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam

2003-12-20 Thread Brent J. Nordquist
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Aaron Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject: Re: XBHGX,7844, tales of these Yes; in looking closer at the ones I've seen, I find one of this variant also. It just had enough backhair that it was caught anyway. :-) Also, my sample of that variant has more than 8 upp

RE: [SAtalk] Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam

2003-12-20 Thread Aaron Everett
tection at http://www.cloudmark.com/spamnetsig/} -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent J. Nordquist Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Christopher X.

[SAtalk] Ruleset for RND UC CHAR spam

2003-12-19 Thread Brent J. Nordquist
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > A Spam got through SA last night, with two things I hadn't seen before - > Yet another form of a %RANDOM variable that isn't replaced by a value: > > Subject: Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], he inadvertently turned Heh, yeah, the developer clearly sc