At 01:16 PM 9/27/03 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
I noted this too.
It doesn't seem like a good idea therefore that spamassassin comes
with a pre-built whitelist; it makes it too easy for abusers to
know which addresses to fake.
Well, bear in mind however that the default whitelist entries are NOT
mere
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:38:15PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >Many spammers are using paypal.com to get their emails "whitelisted". Also
I noted this too.
It doesn't seem like a good idea therefore that spamassassin comes
with a pre-built whitelist; it makes it too easy for abusers to
know whi
At 04:51 PM 9/26/03 -0700, Chad Simmons wrote:
I've noticed after installing Spamassassin, I'm still getting a large
number of
messages passed through without matching any of the rules.
Many spammers are using paypal.com to get their emails "whitelisted". Also
I've
noticed that they will use in
I've noticed after installing Spamassassin, I'm still getting a large number of
messages passed through without matching any of the rules.
Many spammers are using paypal.com to get their emails "whitelisted". Also I've
noticed that they will use invalid HTML tags to hide high risk words from
cont
