Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-16 Thread Ben Jackson
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:02:51AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Check this message my boss forwarded to me. It came from his lawyer and > was tagged by SA via the CAPS rules and some URL rules. > > Funny thing is, there nothing in all caps, and there's absolutely no > URL. This is clearly a l

Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive\

2002-11-14 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:14:17AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Jan Korger wrote: > > > Funny thing is, there nothing in all caps, and there's absolutely no > > > URL. This is clearly a legitimite mail. > > > > Just guessing: a signature not included w

RE: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread McClung, Darren W.
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.31 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v > There's your trouble. Consider upgrading to 2.4x. Darren --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here

Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Jan Korger wrote: > > Funny thing is, there nothing in all caps, and there's absolutely no > > URL. This is clearly a legitimite mail. > > Just guessing: a signature not included when forwarding. Was there an HTML attachment that got stripped out somewhe

Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread Jan Korger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Check this message my boss forwarded to me. It came from his lawyer and > was tagged by SA via the CAPS rules and some URL rules. > > Funny thing is, there nothing in all caps, and there's absolutely no >

Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread Ian MacDougall
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 14:02, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Check this message my boss forwarded to me. It came from his lawyer and > was tagged by SA via the CAPS rules and some URL rules. > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.0 required=5.0 I seet the body of the email through my system and got: X-Spam-Stat

[SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Check this message my boss forwarded to me. It came from his lawyer and was tagged by SA via the CAPS rules and some URL rules. Funny thing is, there nothing in all caps, and there's absolutely no URL. This is clearly a legitimite mail. BTW - my boss's MUA wraps headers when it shouldn't - I've