Re: [SAtalk] Re: spammers whitelisting themselves

2002-09-26 Thread Justin Mason
Scott Henderson said: > I know it sounds unlikely, but it really seems to happen. Here's > an example. First, some of the header/envelope info from an > email that got through SA (recipient address and domain altered): We don't use this format: > Sep 25 14:27:25 mail1 amavis[5169]: (05169-04

[SAtalk] Re: spammers whitelisting themselves

2002-09-26 Thread Scott Henderson
I know it sounds unlikely, but it really seems to happen. Here's an example. First, some of the header/envelope info from an email that got through SA (recipient address and domain altered): Received: from mail1.somecompany.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.somecompany.com [127.0.0.1]) (ama

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spammers whitelisting themselves

2002-09-25 Thread Matthew Cline
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 12:42 pm, Scott Henderson wrote: > From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Amavisd-new has its own SMTP sender whitelist. Check your > >amavisd.conf file. > Sorry, I neglected to mention. I have looked there too. Nothing > in there. The problem is hiding somew

[SAtalk] Re: spammers whitelisting themselves

2002-09-25 Thread Scott Henderson
>From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >SH> I'm running SA 2.31 with postfix and amavisd-new as a anti-spam >SH> mail filtering server. It is working quite well, but I > >Amavisd-new has its own SMTP sender whitelist. Check your >amavisd.conf file. Sorry, I neglected to mention. I have looked