Hi Douglas,
Douglas Kirkland schrieb :
[...]
> And the world could end. What happens if some user messes with
> somebody elses stuff? That what logs are for and boot the user. You
> are god of the servers. Oh sorry, back to the real world. Give them
> guild line in the spamc line on how it w
Hi Brad,
Brad Koehn schrieb :
>
> On Dec 30, 2003, at 5:45 PM, Hans Gerber wrote:
> >
> >>> We only want spamd to listen on '--socketpath=path'. Spamc should
> >be>> invoked from within .procmailrc.
> >>
> >> I could not get this method to work.
> >
> > It does work, afaik unix-socket should be
On Dec 30, 2003, at 5:45 PM, Hans Gerber wrote:
We only want spamd to listen on '--socketpath=path'. Spamc should be
invoked from within .procmailrc.
I could not get this method to work.
It does work, afaik unix-socket should be cheaper with Resources than
TCP_Socket.
The socket implementation app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 15:45, Hans Gerber wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Douglas Kirkland schrieb :
>
> > Why does it matter if one of your users uses some other user's
> > user_prefs file. As far as I am concerned I do not care if one of my
> > user
Hi Douglas,
Douglas Kirkland schrieb :
> Why does it matter if one of your users uses some other user's
> user_prefs file. As far as I am concerned I do not care if one of my
> users uses another user's user_prefs file. They would only hurt
> themselves by using some other user_prefs file. You
Hello,
Hans Gerber schrieb :
> Now there is also the 'spamd --auth-ident' option available. Now my
> question: Is anyone using this option and can it assure that spamd
> wont use any but the user_prefs of the user that is calling spamc?
So far I am not able to get --auth-ident to work. :-<
texa
