Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > Just seems to me that if a program's logging, e.g., SA, is set to go
> to
> > the screen
>
> I don't know what gave you this idea about SA, but it's not the case.
OK then, just seems to me that if a program's logging, e.g., SA, is set
to go to standard error..
Bryan
--
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> > spamd is the thing which is detaching itself from the terminal and
> > therefore losing SA debug messages;
>
> But these messages are dropped when SA is run from .procmailrc aren't
> they? That is, aren't SA's "warning" mess
Is this same problem in procmail 3.15.2 or 3.21? I'd rather try and
get a better procmail than have everyone have to add those two lines
to procmail, so that it works on every recipe. Have you asked for the
patch on the procmail-dev list? I'll ask, if not.
Thanks,
Mark
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 0
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Henrick Yau wrote:
> >From
>
> becomes
>
> rom
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mark Bynum wrote:
> I've been getting an increasing problem where spamassassin will hang (take
> longer than procmail, by default, thinks it should take) and procmail
> will kill it.
>
> Every time t
