David Gibbs said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is there an sa recipe for this latest innovation, with body as follows?
>
> This spam seems to be designed to bypass bayesian analysis ... and it
> appears to work. Almost every piece of spam like this I've seen has the
> BAYES_00 rule, which has a n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an sa recipe for this latest innovation, with body as follows?
This spam seems to be designed to bypass bayesian analysis ... and it
appears to work. Almost every piece of spam like this I've seen has the
BAYES_00 rule, which has a negative score.
Almost all th
