Hello Kenneth,
Friday, January 9, 2004, 6:22:41 AM, you wrote:
KP> --On Friday, January 09, 2004 1:53 AM -0700 Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KP> wrote:
>> For me personally SA is still tagging the spam at a very good rate. I
>> am only seeing these types of spams in my caughtspam folder.
KP>
, January 09, 2004 3:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: dictionary words in ascii part of mime
>
>
> Alex Stade wrote:
> > I run SpamAssassin 2.61 and it catches a lot of spam, but
> lately, there is
> > spam getting through that has bare dic
--On Friday, January 09, 2004 1:53 AM -0700 Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For me personally SA is still tagging the spam at a very good rate. I
am only seeing these types of spams in my caughtspam folder.
I'm seeing them in my Inbox, with BAYES_00 overriding other rules that
would easil
Alex Stade wrote:
> I run SpamAssassin 2.61 and it catches a lot of spam, but lately, there is
> spam getting through that has bare dictionary words in the ASCII part of a
> MIME message and all the usual junk in the multimedia part. When reading
> these e-mails in Outlook or something like that
