On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 17:03, Chris Barnes wrote:
> Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd figure it's better to use your recent ham, the same as with spam,
> > that way your bayes database contains tokens from what's happening now
> > as opposed to what happened years ago.
>
> I underst
Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd figure it's better to use your recent ham, the same as with spam,
> that way your bayes database contains tokens from what's happening now
> as opposed to what happened years ago.
I understand feeding it the recent spam, but see no disadvantages (and
