Re: [SAtalk] Re: We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-22 Thread Robert Nicholson
All of this sounds like where you then have you put your faith in Bayes. Surely there are terms in these emails that are sent that Spammers aren't using in theirs. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert i

[SAtalk] RE: We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-20 Thread SpamTalk
These companies need to get a Habeas mark. Minimally, they should prescreen their formats through SA. Any database created as suggested should include contact information that could be used to provide those suggestions. If/when such companies get whitelisted they should get a temporary reject wit

[SAtalk] RE: We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-20 Thread Gary Smith
Makes sense. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 12:45 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: We have big evil now we need big good... On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:52:00 -0800, "Gar

[SAtalk] Re: We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-20 Thread Scott A Crosby
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:52:00 -0800, "Gary Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So we implemented SA some time ago because our clients were getting > too much spam. Lately we have found that several html marked up > emails have been getting marked as spam. These ones are clearly > fp's. > > Some