Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

2003-12-15 Thread Mike Vanecek
On 15 Dec 2003 12:19:38 +0200, era wrote > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:01:10 -0600, Mike Vanecek >> I ran into this installing 2.61. I just did a --force to get around >> it, but wondered if that was a safe approach? What is the purpose >> of perllocal.pod and why does perl-Mail-SpamAssassin have a

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

2003-12-15 Thread era
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:01:10 -0600, Mike Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote >> >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569 >> Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty >> com

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

2003-12-09 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Mangiafico writes: >> Summary of major changes since 2.60 >> --- >> - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location > >Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting >false positives

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

2003-12-09 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> Summary of major changes since 2.60 > --- > - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting false positives for different header issues and mailserver configs? Just want to make sure b