nal Message-
> From: Jonas Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 9:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Resolving and hat-checking spamvertised URLs...
>
>
> > My patch against SpamAssassin 2.60 (Debian/unstable: 2.60-2)
>
> My patch against SpamAssassin 2.60 (Debian/unstable: 2.60-2)
> http://docsnyder.de/nospam/sa_check_blackhat_isps.patch.gz
Just thought I tell you that I've just applied the patch to SpamAssassin 2.62
(plain tar.gz-distro, no rpm/package).
The patch worked fine, SpamAssassin seems to work,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Florian L. Klein" writes:
>Chris Thielen wrote:
>>
>> I just wanted to share my success using your hosted_in rbl rules. So far,
>> it's hit about 2 spam per day on my primary email account. One of those
>> would have been a false negative, had it n
> That looks like a quite good idea, but running on my SA 2.6:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix]# spamassassin --lint
> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: uriip
> MM_HOSTED_SBL eval:check_uriip_rbl('sbl', 'sbl.spamhaus.org.')
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] postfix]#
>
> I think my SA d
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:33:06 +0100
"Florian L. Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> --- /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uriip_tests.cf
> [...]
>
> ### URLs hosted on RBL'd servers ###
> #
> uriip HOSTED_SBLeval:check_uriip_rbl('sbl', 'sbl.spamhaus.org.')
> describe HOSTED_SBL Uses a URL whose
Chris Thielen wrote:
>
> I just wanted to share my success using your hosted_in rbl rules. So far,
> it's hit about 2 spam per day on my primary email account. One of those
> would have been a false negative, had it not been for your mod :)
Thank you for testing it! :-)
I'm still doing some exp
