On Fri, 24 May 2002, Graham Dunn wrote:
> > >> Or you could just tell postfix that the "spam" transport only handles
> > >> one recipient at a time and let it do the iterating.
>
> Has anyone taken a stab at this when spamassassin is called as part of
> a sendmail milter (mimedefang, notably)?
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:31:38AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "DP" == Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Or you could just tell postfix that the "spam" transport only handles
> >> one recipient at a time and let it do the iterating.
>
> DP> Oh. How do you do that? I don't h
> "DP" == Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or you could just tell postfix that the "spam" transport only handles
>> one recipient at a time and let it do the iterating.
DP> Oh. How do you do that? I don't have the references here at work and
DP> missed that last time I read 'em
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> "DP" == Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DP> If you want to get the filtering per-individual correct, dump the
> DP> first "user" argument entirely, then use the script to iterate
> DP> through the recipient addresses and call SA for ea
> "DP" == Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DP> If you want to get the filtering per-individual correct, dump the first
DP> "user" argument entirely, then use the script to iterate through the
DP> recipient addresses and call SA for each of them.
Or you could just tell postfix that
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Nope, this doesn't work ...
...in all situations.
> try sending yourself a CC'd mail message, and you'll see what I mean
> ... I sent an email to a friend on my server, CC'd it to myself, from
> a remote server, and here is the result that I've rec
Nope, this doesn't work ... try sending yourself a CC'd mail message, and
you'll see what I mean ... I sent an email to a friend on my server, CC'd
it to myself, from a remote server, and here is the result that I've
received:
==
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[...]
>> The simple filtering mode of Postfix, using a shell script and piped
>> data, can have the SMTP envelope information passed on the command
>> line. I
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
> > message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of
> > the recipients themselves ... does it?
>
> I wouldn't a
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
> message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of
> the recipients themselves ... does it?
I wouldn't advise the use of spamproxyd in a filtering context as
10 matches
Mail list logo
