Re: [SAtalk] Re: New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-14 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:20 PM -0600 Scott A Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only other option is to run a javascript interpreter, because > there are a near-infinite number of ways javascript could be used to > create text. There's also the halting problem issue. Any active mater

[SAtalk] Re: New HTML spam body obfuscation.

2004-01-13 Thread Scott A Crosby
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:36 -0600, "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > body JAVASCRIPT_ENCODING_1 /\b(?:\d{1,3}[\s\,]+){8}/ > > describe JAVASCRIPT_ENCODING_1 Contains comma seperated > > ascii representations score 0.1 # you can score this by > > itself if you want. > > >