At 05:02 PM 5/20/02 -0500, Shane Williams wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
> > confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
> > head off before it even gets downloaded.
>
>I'
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
> Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
> confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
> head off before it even gets downloaded.
I'm not entirely sure what mechanisms are available to you
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Michael C. Berch wrote:
> [ How annoying klez is for non-MS users]
>
> Has anyone written a local rule for this? I have just now started
> looking at the messages closely, and the key part seems to be an
> attachment of type audio/x-wav, with a filename of *.(?:pif|scr|exe
