On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Michael Schaap wrote:
> On 1-Oct-2003 01:11, David B Funk wrote:
>
> >Don't /dev/null the spam, reject it. Unlike the procmail/qmail/posfix-ites
> >you have the tools that enable you to "Do the right thing"(tm).
> >With SA+milter+sendmail on your incoming gateway you can give a
At 03:38 3/10/2003 +0200, Michael Schaap wrote:
On 1-Oct-2003 01:11, David B Funk wrote:
Don't /dev/null the spam, reject it. Unlike the procmail/qmail/posfix-ites
you have the tools that enable you to "Do the right thing"(tm).
With SA+milter+sendmail on your incoming gateway you can give an SMTP
On 1-Oct-2003 01:11, David B Funk wrote:
Don't /dev/null the spam, reject it. Unlike the procmail/qmail/posfix-ites
you have the tools that enable you to "Do the right thing"(tm).
With SA+milter+sendmail on your incoming gateway you can give an SMTP
reject status to an attempt to hand you spam (or
