On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:39:24 -0500, Pedro Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On November 26, 2003 12:58 pm, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > Which is next to useless for even 30-40 rules. You would have to have
> > n![1] states for n rules- there is NO way to determine which individual
> > rules will trigge
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:58:19 -0500, Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pedro Sam wrote:
> > hehe, we can give a state to each possible combination of HITS for the
> > rules. So if rules 1, 3, 5, 7 hit, we give that a state, and if 2, 4,
> > 6, 8 hit, we give it another state, and so on...
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:04:03 -0500, Pedro Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On November 25, 2003 10:31 pm, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
> > Heh, it seems it would be nice to make SA scan messages fatser. If I
> > undersand
your idea correctly, you want not to run regexp one by one, but
> > write th
> Its relatively straightforward, and has been known for about 30
> years. See the Dragon book, chapter 3. Add a few enhancements and you
> get an engine with the same semantics that SA uses, recognizing
> overlapping and concurrent patterns at all locations in the input.
Thank for point. Its time
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:31:36 +0600, Alexander Litvinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Heh, it seems it would be nice to make SA scan messages fatser. If I
> undersand your idea correctly, you want not to run regexp one by
> one, but write the state machine for all regepes and walk on this
> states
Rumor has it that Scott A Crosby may have mentioned these words:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:11:10 -0500, Roger Merchberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
The response was that at a half-second a message is enough.
You prolly didn't get many qmailers to respond, then... If it wasn't for SA
& spam, my "o
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:11:10 -0500, Roger Merchberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 03:27 11/25/2003 -0600, Scott A Crosby wrote:
> >An automata based regexp engine is one that can compile a set of
> >regular expressionns down into an automata, then run the automata. The
> >advantage this has
