Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamd warnings

2002-04-16 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:53:21AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > DR> Would you like me to file a bug for the undefined $ENV{PATH}? > > Sure, go ahead. Ok, created as http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214 with a patch attached. Dan. __

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamd warnings

2002-04-16 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Rogers wrote: DR> Oh, I see what it is. I figured that when I didn't see it in the 2.11 DR> release compiled versions that it wasn't there. However, I see now that DR> fixpath.pl strips the -w from non-CVS versions when they're converted from DR> .raw. How smart of fixpath.pl! DR> Woul

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamd warnings

2002-04-16 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:17:09AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Both spamassassin (Oct 20 2001) and spamd (Oct 23 2001) have had -w for a long > time now. Is there a problem with that and/or reason not to have it? I kind of > like it since it draws bugs to people's attentions faster. Not sure

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamd warnings

2002-04-16 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Rogers wrote: DR> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:32:53PM -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote: DR> > Also, can the -w be removed from CVS? DR> DR> Now that I look for it, spamassassin has '-w' too. Is this something that's DR> done in CVS then removed for release, or what? Both spamassassin (Oct 20 20

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamd warnings

2002-04-15 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:32:53PM -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Also, can the -w be removed from CVS? Now that I look for it, spamassassin has '-w' too. Is this something that's done in CVS then removed for release, or what? Dan. ___ Spamassassin-