[SAtalk] RE: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-18 Thread Hill, John
I updated this morning. Now it gives me the same message only on line 155 not 154? --john -Original Message- From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Hill, John Subject: Re: spamd 2.60-cvs On Thursday 17 July 2003 23

[SAtalk] RE: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-17 Thread Hill, John
I moved the directory and ran cvs I then built and compiled. I did not see a new Utils.pm install. is it in the cvs package? Do I need to cpan the cvs? --john -Original Message- From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

[SAtalk] Re: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-17 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Friday 18 July 2003 00:01 CET Hill, John wrote: > Here you go > (Line 154) ${$_}{untaint_var($k)} = untaint_var(${$_}{$k}); Ah, that's indeed my code :o) And now I know how there can be an undef. Thanks Malte P.S.: I though you were using 2.60-cvs from some Slackware repository, ruling

[SAtalk] RE: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-17 Thread Hill, John
Here you go unless (ref) { /^(.*)$/; return $1; } elsif (ref eq 'ARRAY') { @{$_} = map { $_ = untaint_var($_) } @{$_}; return @{$_} if wantarray; } elsif (ref eq 'HASH') { foreach my $k (keys %{$_}) { (Line 154) ${$_}{untaint_var($k)} = untaint_var(${$_}{$k});

[SAtalk] RE: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-17 Thread Hill, John
I have the latest (I think cvs) I could delete the directory and let it update it all? It is the %{$_} weird? --john -Original Message- From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Hill, John Subject: Re: spamd 2.60-cvs

[SAtalk] Re: spamd 2.60-cvs

2003-07-17 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Thursday 17 July 2003 23:29 CET Justin Mason wrote: > Hill, John writes: > >Error on start up: > >Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at > >/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spamassassin/Util.pm line 154 > > not an error, just a warning -- nothing serious, but should probably