On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:31:45PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> My mistake. Its actually reported as 0, not 1. All tokens are
> listed below, but all the counts are listed as 0.
The previously available check_bayes_db won't work with the new DB format.
It'll get VERY confused. The "new" one t
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:23:36PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> Ok. I understand now. Would it be possible to add this to the
> release notes...or is it already in there? I couldn't find anything
> about it. I'm sure a lot of other folks will be seeing the same
> thing.
There wasn't really me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:31:45PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>> My mistake. Its actually reported as 0, not 1. All tokens are
>> listed below, but all the counts are listed as 0.
>
> The previously available check_bayes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Loiterman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I upgraded to RC1 a few minutes ago. First, it wasn't seeing my
> previous database. So I blew it away and started clean.
>
> Problem 1: I sent the sample spam through b
