Allison, Thomas said:
> This is great, thanks so much.
>
> I've been looking at bogofilter for a while and they have a number of
> options that I hope will be somewhat replicated in SpamAssassin:
>
> bogofilter options:
> -u update database(s) while scoring
> -s record as known spam
> -n reco
--On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:13 AM -0500 "Allison, Thomas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I've been looking at bogofilter for a while and they have a number of
| options that I hope will be somewhat replicated in SpamAssassin:
Could perhaps SA simply call bogofilter?
Amos
-
This is great, thanks so much.
I've been looking at bogofilter for a while and they have a number of
options that I hope will be somewhat replicated in SpamAssassin:
bogofilter options:
-u update database(s) while scoring
-s record as known spam
-n record as known non-spam
-S subtract from no
Allison, Thomas said:
> I was looking at the spamassassin.org pages and wasn't certain of two things
> related to the Bayesian filters:
>
> 1) you reference including Bayesian filters by "BAYES_*" rules. I couldn't
> find anything else that elaborates on the wildcard '*'
(cc'ed to -talk to answ
