Re: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Jeff Lasman
On Thursday 06 November 2003 09:19 am, Satya wrote: > >I would say pretty much everyone can block that IP at the firewall > > if they wanted to. I'm thinking on blocking the whole /16 block, as > > we don't do business with India. > > Er, please don't. VSNL is (one of) India's largest ISPs. It'd b

RE: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Santerre
> > On Nov 6, 2003 at 11:35, Chris Santerre wrote: > > >the same for all! I noticed my evilrules was hitting on > 203.197.204.157. Did > >a quick search: > > > >This has ALL the makings of a spamhost. The main page is > just a image for, > >"Cris inc. - mail worldwide." which would be odd sin

Re: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Satya
On Nov 6, 2003 at 11:35, Chris Santerre wrote: >the same for all! I noticed my evilrules was hitting on 203.197.204.157. Did >a quick search: > >This has ALL the makings of a spamhost. The main page is just a image for, >"Cris inc. - mail worldwide." which would be odd since the site is in India!

RE: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Tom Meunier
hursday, November 06, 2003 10:36 AM > To: 'Colin A. Bartlett'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences > > I noticed something last night regarding this certain spam, > the unsub IP is the same for all! I noticed my evilrules was > hitting on 203.19

[SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Santerre
I noticed something last night regarding this certain spam, the unsub IP is the same for all! I noticed my evilrules was hitting on 203.197.204.157. Did a quick search: This has ALL the makings of a spamhost. The main page is just a image for, "Cris inc. - mail worldwide." which would be odd since