Sure do, but eventually I'll try to lookup a non-cached record. If the
server is not responding, then we have to wait for DNS to time out.
--Rich
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
mesage, instead of
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
> mesage, instead of 30. Although I don't think 30 is a bad number at all,
> it can start to be a problem on servers that have a high volume of e-mail,
> and a lot of spamd processes get start
Another dumb question. Where is "rbl_timeout" located? I can't find it
anywhere.
-- Terry
Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> The dsbl lists were not resolving earlier today, still appears to have
> problems.
>
> One fix (suggested by Matt Kettler in a different thread earlier today)
> is to change the RBL
Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
mesage, instead of 30. Although I don't think 30 is a bad number at all,
it can start to be a problem on servers that have a high volume of e-mail,
and a lot of spamd processes get started because they are just waiting for
a respon
Stephen Bader wrote:
I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
it will be corrected soon, but if it isn't, I would l
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:00PM -0600, Stephen Bader wrote:
> I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
> assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
> sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
> it wil
I've noticed that today my messages are taking about 30 seconds each. I'm
assuming this is because of the same things you mentioned. Anyone know for
sure what is going on? I'm not very concerned at this point, as I'm sure
it will be corrected soon, but if it isn't, I would like to know which
checks
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:02:34PM -0600, Terry wrote:
> Today I enabled RBL checking on spamassassin. It is REALLY slow checking all
> of those blackhole lists. (Most messages waiting about 30 seconds) On average
Yeah, today is fairly slow for some of them. It's not always like that, but ...
Today I enabled RBL checking on spamassassin. It is REALLY slow checking all
of those blackhole lists. (Most messages waiting about 30 seconds) On average
we do about 40,000 messages a week, so it's not that big a deal, but I am a
little worried about memory problems when the spammers send in a
