Re: [SAtalk] Question regarding eval() rules and HTML spam

2003-08-14 Thread Justin Mason
Carl R. Friend writes: >For what it's worth, I'm stuck at 2.43 because the newer versions > are too resource-intensive for my rather modest iron. There's the problem right there. Those spams are caught with 2.5x and better with 2.60. :( Why not try out 2.55 *with bayes disabled* -- that sho

[SAtalk] Question regarding eval() rules and HTML spam

2003-08-14 Thread Carl R. Friend
Greetings. I'm new to this list, but not to SpamAssassin, and have a query regarding some of the newer types of spam I'm beginning to see at a small ISP I donate time to. Specifically, I'm talking about the kind of spam that shows up as an HTML link to a HREFed image and *very* little el