stion for the FAQ
You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses,
but I have a
suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a
qualifyer.
Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention
attachments (document.doc.exe) or refered to as inline mime
focus.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivar Magne Auestad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Question for the FAQ
>
>
> You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on v
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:31:33PM -0400, Bruce Pennypacker wrote:
> The problem I'm finding with the latest worm is that sometimes the MIME
> attachment for the actual worm isn't included in the e-mail. I've
> already set MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE high but I'm still getting a few
> e-mails an hour
Jim wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:40PM +0500, Ivar Magne Auestad wrote:
You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a
suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer.
Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention
attac
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:40PM +0500, Ivar Magne Auestad wrote:
> You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a
> suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer.
> Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention
> attachmen
Absolutely.
www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules
among other things.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivar Magne Auestad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Qu
You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a
suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer.
Very many viruses are attached as .pif-files or double extention
attachments (document.doc.exe) or refered to as inline mime code. This
would remove
