RE: [SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

2002-10-07 Thread Lars Hansson
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 23:57, McClung, Darren W. wrote: > I've noticed this too. The version you are seeing first is being reported > by qmail-scanner, the version you are seeing below is what SA is actually > reporting. Apparently when you build the qmail-scanner-queue.pl file, it > embeds the c

RE: [SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

2002-10-07 Thread McClung, Darren W.
Atalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy Here's my relevant system info freebsd-4.7 RC#0/qmail 1.03+ldap patch /ezmlm0.53+idx patch qmail-scanner modification 1.14/spamassassin 2.42 (upgraded from 2.41) tmda 0.62 After upgrading to 2.42 I'm seeing the following

Re: [SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

2002-10-07 Thread Yevgeniy Miretskiy
Modify /var/spool/qmail-scanner/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:30:41AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here's my relevant system info > freebsd-4.7 RC#0/qmail 1.03+ldap patch /ezmlm0.53+idx patch > qmail-scanner modification 1.14/spamassassin 2.42 (upgraded from 2.4

[SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

2002-10-07 Thread joe-dated-1034609318 . a6d470
Here's my relevant system info freebsd-4.7 RC#0/qmail 1.03+ldap patch /ezmlm0.53+idx patch qmail-scanner modification 1.14/spamassassin 2.42 (upgraded from 2.41) tmda 0.62 After upgrading to 2.42 I'm seeing the following headers in the mail message. You'll notice it reports v2.41 when reportin