> "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FA> Do you happen to have any hints on stripping down functionality on
FA> amavisd to use _only_ SpamAssassin and no antivir stuff? I'm searching
FA> strictly for a method to interface Postfix and SpamAssassin that works
FA> well under high
* Florin Andrei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 26, 02 at 23:43:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 06:42, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > > "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
> > FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 06:42, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
> FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
> FA> of the method:
> FA> 1. Get & ins
> "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
FA> of the method:
FA> 1. Get & install SpamAssassin (obvious)
FA> 2. Get spampd
[ ... ]
FA
Florin Andrei said:
> Has anyone compared spampd and spamproxyd in terms of speed and
> reliability under high load?
From what I hear, spampd is much better.
> What is the best solution for interfacing Postfix and SpamAssassin for
> servers under high load? (seems to me like spampd/spamproxyd
(i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
of the method:
1. Get & install SpamAssassin (obvious)
2. Get spampd
http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm
Install various Perl modules req
