Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus

2002-06-15 Thread David B. Bitton
Fresh DailyT - Original Message - From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David B. Bitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 11:34 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus > > what do you mean by 'u

Fw: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus

2002-06-15 Thread David B. Bitton
PROTECTED]> > To: "David B. Bitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 11:22 PM > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus > > > > > > get rid of the procmail link, plug in spa

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus

2002-06-15 Thread Marc G. Fournier
get rid of the procmail link, plug in spamcheck.py as the lmtp connection for postfix, and have spamcheck.py then dump to cyrus' lmtp server for filtering (sieve) and delivery ... On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, David B. Bitton wrote: > Looks like I found the problem w/ Cyrus reporting invalid header. I

[SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus

2002-06-15 Thread David B. Bitton
Looks like I found the problem w/ Cyrus reporting invalid header. I ran a piece of testmail through Spam Assassin and noticed: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 15 22:39:08 2002 and this is not RFC 822 compliant, and therefore Cyrus rejects it. If you add: :0 fwh | formail -I "From " before yo