Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-18 Thread Craig R Hughes
e helpful if you make a summary of your ideas posted to the list here and append it to bugzilla#46 Thanks, C Matthew Cline wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 02:57:53 -0800 > From: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2 >

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-14 Thread Geoff Gibbs
> Per. 5.6.1 (and maybe 5.6.0) can do a zero-width negative look-behind assertion. > Just add > > (? > right before "sex", and it won't match "essex" anymore. (?https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-14 Thread Matthew Cline
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 08:28 am, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Geoff Gibbs wrote: > >I believe that the current version of PORN_4 (2.11) is triggered by :- > > > >http://www.essex.ac.uk/ > > > >giving:- > >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=PORN_4 version=2.11 > Good. That means SpamAss

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-14 Thread Matt Sergeant
Geoff Gibbs wrote: >Matt Sergeant replied: > >>>I believe that the current version of PORN_4 (2.11) is triggered by :- >>> >>>http://www.essex.ac.uk/ >>> > >>Good. That means SpamAssassin is working ;-) >> > >I am not sure that the burgers of that fine county would see it quite >like that ;-) I w

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Matthew Cline
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 02:56 pm, Matthew Cline wrote: > On Wednesday 13 March 2002 02:57 am, Matthew Cline wrote: > > body PORN_12 > > /(?:(?:\bxxx|\bsex|\bslut|\bwhore|\bhottest\b|hard-?core|\bhorny\b|\bhorn > >ie st\b|\bvirgin|\bnaughty\b|\bnaughtiest\b|\bwebcam||\ble[sz]b(?:ian|o) > > d

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Matthew Cline
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 02:57 am, Matthew Cline wrote: > body PORN_12 > /(?:(?:\bxxx|\bsex|\bslut|\bwhore|\bhottest\b|hard-?core|\bhorny\b|\bhornie >st\b|\bvirgin|\bnaughty\b|\bnaughtiest\b|\bwebcam||\ble[sz]b(?:ian|o) > describe PORN_12Uses words and phrases

RE: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Michael Moncur
Maybe it would be better to have a separate eval check for porn phrases, kind of like the spam phrases checking. Then a simple word like "sex" or "naked" wouldn't be worth much, but a message with a high percentage of words on the list would be regarded as spam. The words could be individually sc

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Geoff Gibbs
Matt Sergeant replied: > >I believe that the current version of PORN_4 (2.11) is triggered by :- > > > >http://www.essex.ac.uk/ > Good. That means SpamAssassin is working ;-) I am not sure that the burgers of that fine county would see it quite like that ;-) I would have thought that while it i

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Matt Sergeant
Geoff Gibbs wrote: >>uri PORN_4 >> >/^https?:\/\/[\w\.]*(?:xxx|sex|anal|slut|pussy|cum|nympho|suck|porn|hardcore|tab >oo|whore|voyeur|lesbian|gurlpages|naughty|lolita|teen|schoolgirl|kooloffer|eroti >c|lust|panty|panties)\w*\./ > >I believe that the current version of PORN_4 (2.11) is triggered

Re: [SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Geoff Gibbs
> uri PORN_4 /^https?:\/\/[\w\.]*(?:xxx|sex|anal|slut|pussy|cum|nympho|suck|porn|hardcore|tab oo|whore|voyeur|lesbian|gurlpages|naughty|lolita|teen|schoolgirl|kooloffer|eroti c|lust|panty|panties)\w*\./ I believe that the current version of PORN_4 (2.11) is triggered by :- http://www.essex.ac.

[SAtalk] PORN ideas 2

2002-03-13 Thread Matthew Cline
Ooops, hehe; sorry about that... Interesting subject for a technical mailing list, huh? :-) I started fiddling around with the PORN_3 rule because it wasn't catching any of the porn spam that I got. body PORN_3 /(?:(?:\bcum|\borg[iy]|\bwild|fuck|\bteen|\baction\b|spunk|\bp

[SAtalk] PORN ideas

2002-03-13 Thread Matthew Cline
-- Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm largest human edited web directory. | for a minute, but set him on fire, and | he'll be warm for the rest of his life. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 132152059 | ___