Re: [SAtalk] Outlook express and sendmail

2002-06-05 Thread David T-G
Hi! ...and then Web administrator (Tratti.com s.r.l.) said... % % i read that razor can handle forward attached email.. % outlook express cannot bounce message It can probably handle mime-encapsulated forwarded messages, but it's true that any changes in the body will muck up the razor report.

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook express and sendmail

2002-06-05 Thread Olivier Nicole
>i read that razor can handle forward attached email.. >outlook express cannot bounce message There are hundreds of MUA and each has a different way to present attachements. How could Razor handle all of them? You can also save the message to a file and spamassassin -r http://devcon.sprintpcs.c

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook express and sendmail

2002-06-05 Thread Web administrator \(Tratti.com s.r.l.\)
i read that razor can handle forward attached email.. outlook express cannot bounce message > > another problem is that all my clients use outlook express=20 > >and they send forward message > > is this handle correctly by razor-report and=20 > > No. > > For safe use of razor, you must bounce

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook express and sendmail

2002-06-05 Thread Olivier Nicole
> another problem is that all my clients use outlook express=20 >and they send forward message > is this handle correctly by razor-report and=20 No. For safe use of razor, you must bounce the message, not forward it. Forward always changes the body of the email, and razor needs an unaltered body

[SAtalk] Outlook express and sendmail

2002-06-05 Thread Web administrator \(Tratti.com s.r.l.\)
I've installed mail scanner to scan for virus all of email in my server and then I installed spamassin to work together to stop spam. I've installed also Razor and i've create an email-account that send all the email to @spamtraps.taint.org i would to create an email for my clients like 

Re: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159

2002-05-30 Thread rODbegbie
Patrice Fournier wrote: > Has anyone ever seen a legitimate email with an X-Mailer: header of > OutLook Express 3.14159? I'm also seeing this here. I'd agree with the rule being added. rOD. -- "I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night" >> Doing the blogging thang again at ht

Re: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159

2002-05-30 Thread Brian May
3.14159 is the begining of Pi... I don't think M$ would be that cute about its version number.. Brian - Original Message - From: "Patrice Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: [SAtalk] OutLook Expres

[SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159

2002-05-30 Thread Patrice Fournier
Hi, Has anyone ever seen a legitimate email with an X-Mailer: header of OutLook Express 3.14159? I've just got 9 spam messages in the last two days using this header line 6 of which were not even caugh as spam by SA (treshold of 7.0). So I added a local rule for that header (and other checks

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook Express

2002-03-13 Thread Kerry Nice
Ok, a bit of a hack and there is probably a better way to do this, but it works for me. Anything that gets past all the filters and ends up in my inbox I move to the 1spam folder and an hourly cron job routes it to spamcop and other places. Kerry. #hourly.spam.report.sh #!/bin/sh grep "From "

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook Express

2002-03-12 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote: > client does n ot have a bounce/redirect function they are unable to > report SPAM back to the system. Does anyone know of an easy no brainer > for the user to be able to do this. This isn't exactly bouncing, but: To send a message as an

[SAtalk] Outlook Express

2002-03-12 Thread Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson
I know I have seen this on the list before but for some reason am unable to locate it. Some of the users on my system get their e-mail via IMAP from the mail server using Outlook Express. Since this mail client does n ot have a bounce/redirect function they are unable to report SPAM back to the sy