Re: [SAtalk] OT Reverse spam.

2002-07-12 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:09:39AM -0700, Craig R. Hughes wrote: > > That's probably illegal in a lot of jurisdictions. Probably so. Perhaps I need to put an "acceptable use policy" on my web site. I can warn them in advance that if they violate it, I won't be bashful about responding. Jeremy

Re: [SAtalk] OT Reverse spam.

2002-07-12 Thread Craig R . Hughes
That's probably illegal in a lot of jurisdictions. C On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 04:13 PM, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:34:19PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote: >> >> The other day, I got this little jewel in my e-mail. So I >> decided to have a >> little fun. I sent a repl

Re: [SAtalk] OT Reverse spam.

2002-07-11 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:34:19PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote: > > The other day, I got this little jewel in my e-mail. So I decided to have a > little fun. I sent a reply to the sender indicating that I was very > interested in their investment offer. Never heard back from them. So, I've > b

[SAtalk] OT Reverse spam.

2002-07-11 Thread Mike Diehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 04 July 2001 10:56 pm, BASSY OKON wrote: > SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results > -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original > message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognis