I understand. Thanks
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:10:55
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
>At 01:02 PM 1/21/2004, st semps wrote:
>
>>You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that
>>somewh
At 01:02 PM 1/21/2004, st semps wrote:
You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that
somewhere. Obviously Im wrong.
Actually, it apparently is valid.. my bad..
However, the string returned won't contain the To: or Cc: parts, just the
email addresses.
--
Thanks for the help.
You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that somewhere. Obviously
Im wrong.
Thank you.
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:58:36
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
>Well, y
Well, your rule is pretty wildly off.. ToCc is going to look for a header
named ToCc, not To headers and/or CC headers.
header __TO_EXISTS exists:to
header __CC_EXISTS exists:cc
meta NO_TO_OR_NO_CC (!__TO_EXISTS || !__CC_EXISTS)
Or perhaps you want
meta NO_TO_AND_N
Can someone tell me how to look for no To or CC field in the header.
I get several emails sent to me like this and would like to score them.
Best I could come up with is
ToCc !~ /To|cc/i
Can someone tell me how Im suppose to do this.
Regards
Steve
