Hello,
> Pierre Bacquet wrote:
>
> > Hello fellow spam fighters,
>
> SA version?
>
> S*ll* *d**t
What's that ?? I was reporting what seemed to be a new technique
and I wasn't requesting any help to tweak my rules. Thus asking
me what is my SA version is not very important (actually it is 2.54)
Pierre Bacquet wrote:
Thus asking
me what is my SA version is not very important (actually it is 2.54)
and treating me of a "*i**y i*io*" is rather crude.
Not so. Each SA version update uses modified and improved techniques for
analysis. If you were to update to 2.60 (I'm using 2.60-CVS) you'd
p
Pierre Bacquet wrote:
Hello fellow spam fighters,
SA version?
S*ll* *d**t
Antoine
--
Tony Earnshaw
Humor him and he'll go away
http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm
http://www.billy.demon.nl
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net emai
Hello fellow spam fighters,
I don't know if it has already been signalled, but this is a trick I have
seen in one
SPAM that I've got :
We were aware of one technique which is beaking some words (well known by
filters) using
HTML comments. I've found such technique that uses a different trick :
P
