Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam

2003-06-29 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Steve Phariss wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2003 12:18:44 -0700: > I would put the tests in local.cf right? I am running non-root user. > Yes, if that is readable by that user. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http:

Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam

2003-06-29 Thread Thomas Cameron
03 2:18 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam > Kai, > > I would put the tests in local.cf right? I am running non-root user. > > steve > > - Original Message - > From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > S

Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam

2003-06-29 Thread Steve Phariss
Kai, I would put the tests in local.cf right? I am running non-root user. steve - Original Message - From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 3:31 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam > Steve Phariss

Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam

2003-06-29 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Steve Phariss wrote on Sat, 28 Jun 2003 23:00:50 -0700: > http://www.domainsforpeople.com > Since they seem to be holding on for this name, I use this test for them: body SPAM_URL_11 /domainsforpeople/i score SPAM_URL_11 100.0 I also have a much less agressive scoring for this test: u

[SAtalk] New Domain spam

2003-06-28 Thread Steve Phariss
Over the last few weeks I have been getting this piece of spam and it is bypassing the filters. My set up is a local user (running all email through procmail) with the following .procmailrc lines: :0fw: spamassassin.lock | /home/lww/sausr/bin/spamassassin :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Ye