Do you have a size threshold set? I believe that 2.43 has a setting that
won't scan a message over a certain file size, and this message was around
340K. It might have been too big, and SA might have skipped it due to its
size.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:23:04PM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Just got a message through with the following headers. The message (which
> was spam) was not even processed by spamd even if log indicates it was sent
> for filtering.
>
> Dec 2 11:12:47 bebop postfix/qmgr[74304]: 43DB0142D7
spamc by default doesn't process huge messages over 250k in size. This
message was 340k.
see man spamc:
-s max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any
bigger than this threshold and the message will be returned
unprocessed. No
Per olof Ljungmark said:
> Yes, as several pointed out, that was the problem. This spammer sends the
> entire catalogue as a pdf, did a spamc -s 1048576 to fix.
interestingly it was a real person sending mail from a real desktop
machine - one of those rare "one to one" spams that are hard to
tel
At 07:41 12/2/2002 -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
Do you have a size threshold set? I believe that 2.43 has a setting that
won't scan a message over a certain file size, and this message was around
340K. It might have been too big, and SA might have skipped it due to its
size.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Pe
Hi all,
Just got a message through with the following headers. The message (which
was spam) was not even processed by spamd even if log indicates it was sent
for filtering.
Can anybody help me understand what is going on here? FreeBSD/Postfix
1.1.11/SA 2.43
Thanks,
Per olof
Headers:
X-Pers
