Re: [SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

2003-12-23 Thread Adam Denenberg
sorry i missed this in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop', 'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3') describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP tflags RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP net On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 14:45, Adam Denenberg w

Re: [SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

2003-12-23 Thread Adam Denenberg
i found this http://www.dnsbl.njabl.org/use.html but also note this comment Our dnsbl can also be used to tag potential spam messages (letting individual users decide what action to take) using Spamassassin. After you have Spamassassin properly installed, add the following to your local.cf, p

Re: [SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

2003-12-23 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Mike Grau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can someone tell me if, using SA 2.61, the > NJABL test for dialup "dnsbl.njabl.org" is correct > or should we be using "dynablock.njabl.org"? You can use either or both. This from a recent update message from NJABL: For anyo

[SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

2003-12-23 Thread Mike Grau
Hello. Can someone tell me if, using SA 2.61, the NJABL test for dialup "dnsbl.njabl.org" is correct or should we be using "dynablock.njabl.org"? Instead of this: header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop', 'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3') describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP N

[SAtalk] NJABL Dialup test

2003-12-23 Thread Mike G
Hello. Can someone tell me if, using SA 2.61, the NJABL test for dialup "dnsbl.njabl.org" is correct or should we be using "dynablock.njabl.org"? Instead of this: header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop', 'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3') describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP