Re: [SAtalk] More .procmailrc

2003-12-05 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Satya wrote: > On Dec 5, 2003 at 08:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Adding insult to injury, Procmail won't cope if the first character of > >a regular expression is a backslash, so we have to add a set of parens > >to protect +that+ as well. > > > > * ^Subject: (\*\*\*\*\*

Re: [SAtalk] More .procmailrc

2003-12-02 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Rich H. wrote: > This is a copy of the logs: Looks like you may have edited the .procmailrc on a Windows machine and ended up with Windows-style line endings on the added lines (that is, both a carriage-return and a linefeed). Procmail only understands Unix line endings (line

[SAtalk] More .procmailrc

2003-12-02 Thread Rich H.
This box is running RH 7.0 with procmail 3.22-7. What is the proper format of the .procmailrc file? I don't think I have ever seen something so picky. I have my file set up exactly like this: SHELL=/bin/sh PATH=/bin:/usr/bin MAILDIR=$HOME/m