Keith C. Ivey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) replied:
> That happens surprisingly often for me, too. If you look at
> the definitions for the BAYES_* rules in 20_bayes.cf, you'll
> see that messages with Bayes scores between 0.4999 and 0.5001
> are not tagged. When I've checked the spamd log for messag
Marc Steuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got Bayes working with SA 2.60 and occasionally, a scanned
> message will not have an entry for its Bayes score in the
> detailed listing of pts, rule name and description. Is this
> "normal" behavior?
That happens surprisingly often for me, too. If
Friends,
I've got Bayes working with SA 2.60 and occasionally, a scanned message will
not have an entry for its Bayes score in the detailed listing of pts, rule
name and description. Is this "normal" behavior?
Also, some messages are given very low Bayes scores but are assessed as spam
by SA wit
