Re[2]: [SAtalk] Mass-Check

2004-01-12 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Smart,Dan, Monday, January 12, 2004, 6:57:26 AM, you wrote: SD> Bob: SD> I take it from your docs that you do not try to run a mass-check against all SD> your rules at one time, but instead do it a dozen at a time? Both. I do a massive check against all my rules (and the distribution rule

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-Check

2004-01-11 Thread Bill Landry
Wow, very nice Bob! Thanks for sharing this with the list. I'll give it a try this next week and see how it goes. Bill - Original Message - From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: [

[SAtalk] Mass-Check

2004-01-11 Thread Robert Menschel
Some people have been asking about my mass-check capabilities and reports. I've just completed documenting my current system at http://www.exit0.us/index.php/BobCorpusTest I'll gladly update that documentation to answer questions people may have, and will even update/improve my script if people h

Re[2]: [SAtalk] mass-check and hit-frequencies help needed

2004-01-02 Thread Spam Control
Hello Chris, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 11:50:53 AM, you wrote: CT> Here's how I do it: CT> cd /c/home/owner/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60/rules CT> mkdir disabled CT> mv *.cf disabled CT> Now you have a pristine work area to place your rulesets which CT> mass-check and hit-frequencies will pay attenti

Re: [SAtalk] mass-check and hit-frequencies help needed

2004-01-01 Thread Chris Thielen
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 20:23, Robert Menschel wrote: > I'm hoping someone can help me with mass-check, or more specifically with > hit-frequencies. > > I've installed Cygwin on my W/XP-H box. Within Cygwin I've installed SA, > not to use for mail filtering (that happens on my servers), but > specif

[SAtalk] mass-check and hit-frequencies help needed

2003-12-31 Thread Robert Menschel
I'm hoping someone can help me with mass-check, or more specifically with hit-frequencies. I've installed Cygwin on my W/XP-H box. Within Cygwin I've installed SA, not to use for mail filtering (that happens on my servers), but specifically for mass-check. Directory structure: C:\cygwin /hom

RE: [SAtalk] Mass-check corpus cleanup using included scripts. Ho w??

2003-12-12 Thread Smart,Dan
Thanks for the insight. When I run mass-check-results-to-mbox I get: --- # sort -rn +1 ham.log | head -20 | ./mass-check-results-to-mbox open /usr/local/src/confham.1173754 failed: at ./mass-check-results-to-mbox line 125, <> line 1. X-Mass-Check-Warning: open /usr/local/

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check corpus cleanup using included scripts. How??

2003-12-12 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Smart,Dan writes: > I'm trying to do the mass-check corpus cleanup using the method in > CORPUS_SUBMIT file. My hard-sorted spams and hams are stored in MBOXs. > > I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and > extract-mes

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check corpus cleanup using included scripts. How??

2003-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 09:34 AM 12/12/2003, Smart,Dan wrote: I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and extract-message-from-mbox are used to help in this process to check and purge improperly sorted mails out of the mbox. How are these used? Don't see any docs anywhere, and nothing in t

[SAtalk] Mass-check corpus cleanup using included scripts. How??

2003-12-12 Thread Smart,Dan
I'm trying to do the mass-check corpus cleanup using the method in CORPUS_SUBMIT file. My hard-sorted spams and hams are stored in MBOXs. I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and extract-message-from-mbox are used to help in this process to check and purge improperl

[SAtalk] mass-check failure: hit-frequencies, parse-rules-for-masses

2003-09-13 Thread Robert Menschel
I've reached the point where my email client isn't able to handle all of the rule matching analysis I'm asking of it. So I'm trying to get mass-check to work so I can analyze individual rules. Minor handicap: I'm a domain user on a shared virtual domain server. I don't have admin access to most o

RE: [SAtalk] mass-check and user_prefs

2003-08-20 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] mass-check and user_prefs > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > After s

[SAtalk] mass-check and user_prefs

2003-08-20 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After several months of developing rules and testing them with regex searches within my email client, I'm thinking it's time for me to actually begin using mass-check to test new rules. Challenge: I'm a domain master on a shared domain server, and don

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check

2002-03-13 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Perl 5.6.0 by any chance? Upgrade. > > This is perl, v5.6.1 built for i386-freebsd Then it's probably the lines above that convert numeric entities into their actual characters. Can you check the email in question for numeric entities? -- Matt. <:

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check

2002-03-13 Thread Olivier Nicole
> Perl 5.6.0 by any chance? Upgrade. This is perl, v5.6.1 built for i386-freebsd Nope Matt. Olivier ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check

2002-03-13 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > I also noticed the following error message while mass-check was running: > > > > Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0xc3 after > > start byte 0xe4) in substitution iterator at > > ../lib/Mail/SpamAss

Re: [SAtalk] Mass-check

2002-03-12 Thread Craig R Hughes
Olivier Nicole wrote: > I also noticed the following error message while mass-check was running: > > Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0xc3 after > start byte 0xe4) in substitution iterator at > ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 729, line 5890. > > Failed

[SAtalk] Mass-check

2002-03-12 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, Yesterday I have mass-check'ed 5 weeks worth of email, after downl,oading the lasted SA 2.20 (not from CVS, I did not find any reference to CVS) (spam and non-spam (OK, I made the mistake to put back the false -ve or false +ve in the global corpus, next time I'll prepare 4 categories)). Alto