On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:07:25AM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Consider the possibility that you have learnt something as spam and you
> want to relearn
> it as ham and vice-versa. Currently, if I'm not mistaken this requires
> the following
>
> wouldn't it be easier to simply say
>
> $m->
I've decided it's reasonable to expect someone to want to forget a
message at the same
time as learning it.
Consider the possibility that you have learnt something as spam and you
want to relearn
it as ham and vice-versa. Currently, if I'm not mistaken this requires
the following
#forget $mail
At 06:53 PM 12/13/2003, Robert Nicholson wrote:
$status = $f->learn ($mail, $id, $isspam, $forget)
suggests that both $isspam and $forget are significant however
it will only ever do one or the other not both.
Well, forget inherently means you want to remove an entry instead of
learn.. at that po
The way this interface is defined
$status = $f->learn ($mail, $id, $isspam, $forget)
suggests that both $isspam and $forget are significant however
it will only ever do one or the other not both.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linu