Re: [SAtalk] Mail::SpamAssassin::learn

2003-12-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:07:25AM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote: > Consider the possibility that you have learnt something as spam and you > want to relearn > it as ham and vice-versa. Currently, if I'm not mistaken this requires > the following > > wouldn't it be easier to simply say > > $m->

Re: [SAtalk] Mail::SpamAssassin::learn

2003-12-19 Thread Robert Nicholson
I've decided it's reasonable to expect someone to want to forget a message at the same time as learning it. Consider the possibility that you have learnt something as spam and you want to relearn it as ham and vice-versa. Currently, if I'm not mistaken this requires the following #forget $mail

Re: [SAtalk] Mail::SpamAssassin::learn

2003-12-13 Thread Matt Kettler
At 06:53 PM 12/13/2003, Robert Nicholson wrote: $status = $f->learn ($mail, $id, $isspam, $forget) suggests that both $isspam and $forget are significant however it will only ever do one or the other not both. Well, forget inherently means you want to remove an entry instead of learn.. at that po

[SAtalk] Mail::SpamAssassin::learn

2003-12-13 Thread Robert Nicholson
The way this interface is defined $status = $f->learn ($mail, $id, $isspam, $forget) suggests that both $isspam and $forget are significant however it will only ever do one or the other not both. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linu