Re: [SAtalk] Long list of rules that must be broken

2003-07-08 Thread Bob Proulx
Pat Traynor wrote: > If this is a clueless newbie question, please just give me a few mild > slaps. I agree with the other comment that this is a procmail question. But since you asked... > :0 > * ^Subject.*lueberry*|\ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]|\ > ^Subject.*Business directory addition request*|\

Re: [SAtalk] Long list of rules that must be broken

2003-07-08 Thread Steve Thomas
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:59:08AM -0400, Pat Traynor is rumored to have said: > > In my .procmailrc file is: > INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmailrc-local > ... I don't mean to snipe, but this has nothing to do with SA at all. It really belongs on a procmail list. To answer the question, I'm no procmail

Re: [SAtalk] Long list of rules that must be broken

2003-07-08 Thread Pat Traynor
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Steve Thomas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:59:08AM -0400, Pat Traynor is rumored to have said: > > > > In my .procmailrc file is: > > INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmailrc-local > > ... > > I don't mean to snipe, but this has nothing to do with SA at all. It really belongs > on

[SAtalk] Long list of rules that must be broken

2003-07-08 Thread Pat Traynor
The play on words wasn't originally intended... If this is a clueless newbie question, please just give me a few mild slaps. In my .procmailrc file is: INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmailrc-local In .procmailrc-local is my list of "forced bad" and "forced good" subjects and addresses, e.g.: :0 * ^Subjec