RE: [SAtalk] Log Question...

2003-10-31 Thread Larry Gilson
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Tappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question... > > > Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list: > > > Oct 30 14:12:

RE: [SAtalk] Log Question...

2003-10-31 Thread Dan Tappin
Ahhh... that would explain it. I did not realize that. Nevermind... Thanks Matt, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtal

Re: [SAtalk] Log Question...

2003-10-31 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:18 AM 10/31/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list: > Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Is there a config option to have these triggered rules logged like that? My maillog simply has mail identified or not identified as spam. It would be great to

RE: [SAtalk] Log Question...

2003-10-31 Thread spamassassin-talk
iginal Message- > From: Dan Tappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question... > > > Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list: > > > Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3

[SAtalk] Log Question...

2003-10-31 Thread Dan Tappin
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list: > Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Message h9UMAPR07828 from > 61.59.154.73 () > to userdomain.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=28.325, required > 5, BAYES_99 > 6.00, FORGED_AOL_RCVD 4.10, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 2.57, > FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 1.00,