RE: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery

2003-07-01 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Radford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery > > > Hi all, > > Now I admit that I don't regularly read all the he

Re: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery

2003-06-30 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Martin Radford wrote: What's interesting is that the header at the bottom is clearly forged - 194.217.242.6 *is* punt-2.mail.demon.net, which is one of the two MX records for my domain zamenhof.demon.co.uk. The genuine Received header is the one above. Is this a new spammer trick - to forge a R

[SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Radford
Hi all, Now I admit that I don't regularly read all the headers of spam that I receive, but this one intrigued me. Take a look at its Received headers: > Received: from tele-punt-22.mail.demon.net (tele-punt-22.mail.demon.net > [194.217.242.7]) > by zamenhof.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) wit