On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 the voices made Ben Jackson write:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:24:38AM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> >
> > I've been hit by this too, and I can't help but think that these blacklists do
> > more harm than good. Spammers will easily move on, but for the small non-tech
> >
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:24:38AM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
> I've been hit by this too, and I can't help but think that these blacklists do
> more harm than good. Spammers will easily move on, but for the small non-tech
> company it could take a week of no business before they're back
There are some interesting ideas for clogging spam mailing lists at
http://www.turnstep.com/Spambot/. I added a short php script to do our
part at http://www.dovesystems.com/BuildPage.php?page=contact . Maybe
someday they'll advertise 100,000,000 email addresses, two or three of
which are guarante
Clearly, getting a spammer's connection terminated isn't enough of a
deterrent to keep them from spamming. Perhaps getting the spammers
themselves terminated would be...
...anyone got a good sniper rifle? ;)
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
>don't own. According to the SPEWS event ticket its just a single server there
>which had sent Spam (with 4 IPs on it according to NMAP) and SPEWS blocks
>+60K IP addresses thanks to that fact. There is absolutely no way to get out
>of SPEWS until the owner of the netblock shuts down the spamme
> > Being heavy-handed isn't the same thing as being Nazi-ish. No matter how
> > heavy handed they might be, the real-world equivalent of black-lists are
> > boycotts, not Fascists and dictators.
>
> Nothing against heavy handed measures against Spammers, but hey .. being
> counted off as accep
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 the voices made Michael Stauber write:
> That's no unique event and I've seen that happening a couple of times with
> different providers and different blacklists in recent years. Its not exactly
> fun.
I've been hit by this too, and I can't help but think that these blacklis
Hi Mattew,
> Being heavy-handed isn't the same thing as being Nazi-ish. No matter how
> heavy handed they might be, the real-world equivalent of black-lists are
> boycotts, not Fascists and dictators.
I'd say taking entire IP-subnets into "Sippenhaft" (collective hostage taking)
to catch just
On Monday 01 July 2002 06:04 pm, Michael Stauber wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> > Right, we're dictators, *forcing* our concerns on the masses
> > *yearning* for email advertisements, and he's a freedom fighter. Or
> > something.
> I'm fully with you in the trenches on this one, Matthew. FWIW: I've be
Hi Matthew,
> Right, we're dictators, *forcing* our concerns on the masses
> *yearning* for email advertisements, and he's a freedom fighter. Or
> soemthing.
I'm fully with you in the trenches on this one, Matthew. FWIW: I've been
fighting Spam for years, but sometimes I'm also pricelessly puz
Matthew Cline wrote:
> > Scelson, who designed the software, says it will penetrate virtually
>
> > any system designed to stop ads from reaching the intended mailbox.
>
> > "If it accepts e-mail, there's a way in," he says. "And this is
> > designed to get around anything."
Yeah, right. Looks
http://www.ctnow.com/technology/hc-sp1scelsonjun30.story?coll=hc-headlines-home
> The program allows him to control every aspect of the outgoing
> e-mail - including masking the sender, randomly changing the subject
> line or disguising the point of origin.
A legitamit business which needs
12 matches
Mail list logo
