On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:07:34PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:37:51PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 15,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:37:51PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I put S
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> > > proble
On 15 March 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> problems -- I grabbed the .tgz, ran the perl Makefile.PL, noted that
> I needed a gdm lib, found the right package, apt-get'd it (yes, the
> Potato libgdm-dev works nicely) and ran th
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I put SA on my potato box yesterday (and then joined this list). No
> > problems -- I grabbed the .tgz, ran the perl Makefile.PL, noted that
> > I needed a
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:19:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:26:11PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> >
> > > Dear all
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:26:11PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
>
> > Dear all - thanks for the great support. I have (manually) applied the
> > above patch
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> > Finally, it *doesn't matter* -- I bet that using Perl's linker flags for
> > spamc is unnecessary and irrelevant. So here's my third and final
> > Makefile.PL patc
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:57:12AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Here's the final fix to this problem -- the trick was that the Makefile
> was trying to compile spamc with the same flags that perl itself was
> compiled with, which is overkill (particularly the libs stuff). So I've
> removed the li
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> Finally, it *doesn't matter* -- I bet that using Perl's linker flags for
> spamc is unnecessary and irrelevant. So here's my third and final
> Makefile.PL patch, which should fix the problem instead of just trying
> to figure out what's
Here's the final fix to this problem -- the trick was that the Makefile
was trying to compile spamc with the same flags that perl itself was
compiled with, which is overkill (particularly the libs stuff). So I've
removed the libs bits. This is checked into CVS now.
--- Makefile.PL 31 Jan 2002
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 15:11:59 -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> You can hand edit the Makefile after perl Makefile.PL, but a
> probably better solution would be to find why MakeMaker on your machine
> is trying to link libndbm in. Could you add a line to the Makefile.PL
> in the spamc build rule to
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 15:11:59 -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> You can hand edit the Makefile after perl Makefile.PL, but a
> probably better solution would be to find why MakeMaker on your machine
> is trying to link libndbm in. Could you add a line to the Makefile.PL
> in the spamc build rule t
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 18:13:30 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> Hmmm, everyone's going on about libndbm, but nobody's asking about Perl.
> It might be Perl's fault that -lndbm is included in the link command for
> spamc. Which Perl version are you using? Is it the Debian package, or
> did you build
In reality, it shouldn't really require any of those. It will compile
and link just find without any linked-in libs.
Which I guess answers the question how to fix it. I'll just remove the
" $(CFLDFLAGS) $(CFLIBS)"
from the end of the Makefile.PL rule for spamc.
C
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 15:05
On 12 February 2002, Erik van der Meulen said:
> Am I right in interpreting your answer '-lndbm is not required' that I
> can modify the Makefile so it does not inculde that particular option
> and build again? I am a little unsure in this field, have never coded a
> line in my life...
Hmmm, ever
You can do that yes. spamc pretty much requires almost nothing to link
against, and MakeMaker insists on jamming a bunch of things into the
linker. You can hand edit the Makefile after perl Makefile.PL, but a
probably better solution would be to find why MakeMaker on your machine
is trying to li
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:40:46PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 17:22:29 -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>
> > On my system, -lndbm is not required, it seems. I think it has to do with
> > MakeMaker choosing what is needed (incorrectly?). However, libndbm.so is
> > lis
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 17:22:29 -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On my system, -lndbm is not required, it seems. I think it has to do with
> MakeMaker choosing what is needed (incorrectly?). However, libndbm.so is
> listed as belonging to libc6-dev on potato, on packages.d.o.
Thanks a lot for you
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:04:14PM -0500, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> | Dear all - this is my first go at installing Spamassassin and I get
> | stuck in the 'make' procedure. It results in:
>
> | /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lndbm
>
> | I
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
| Dear all - this is my first go at installing Spamassassin and I get
| stuck in the 'make' procedure. It results in:
| /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lndbm
| I have tried to look around for this error and what it might be
| miss
Dear all - this is my first go at installing Spamassassin and I get
stuck in the 'make' procedure. It results in:
souterrain:/home/erik/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01# make
cc -Dbool=char -DHAS_BOOL -D_REENTRANT -DDEBIAN -I/usr/local/include
-O2 spamd/spamc.c \
-o spamd/spamc -L/usr/local/lib
22 matches
Mail list logo
