Jason Brunette wrote:
> Problem is timelog() in Mail::SpamAssassin.
Thank you for the expalination.
> spamd doesn't have this problem because the timelog log entries are
> stored in a forked spamd process which dies after a message is
> scanned.
The problem occurs if you use a modified version o
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Klaus Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I did some more tests today. I installed the &
Hi,
I did some more tests today. I installed the "Devel::Leak" perl package
on the linux computer. This can be used to count number of "object"
instances. I hope the package works ok because it's an very early
version number (0.02).
Test:
I added the data count function at five different parts of
Hi,
I have a problem with increasing memory usage of SpamAssassin on windows
(spamc/spamd). I created a stand alone test program to check if the
increasing memory is a problem of communication code or SA. The program
tests the sample-spam.txt file using a loop of 1000 times.
Result (Win2k SP4; Ac