Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-18 Thread Klaus Mueller
Jason Brunette wrote: > Problem is timelog() in Mail::SpamAssassin. Thank you for the expalination. > spamd doesn't have this problem because the timelog log entries are > stored in a forked spamd process which dies after a message is > scanned. The problem occurs if you use a modified version o

RE: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-17 Thread Jason Brunette
gt; -Original Message- > From: Klaus Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem > > > Hi, > > I did some more tests today. I installed the &

Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-17 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I did some more tests today. I installed the "Devel::Leak" perl package on the linux computer. This can be used to count number of "object" instances. I hope the package works ok because it's an very early version number (0.02). Test: I added the data count function at five different parts of

[SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-16 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I have a problem with increasing memory usage of SpamAssassin on windows (spamc/spamd). I created a stand alone test program to check if the increasing memory is a problem of communication code or SA. The program tests the sample-spam.txt file using a loop of 1000 times. Result (Win2k SP4; Ac