On Thursday, January 16, 2003, 12:23:30 AM, you wrote:
CE> I use this:
CE> # This is a reformulation of standard test VERY_SUSP_RECIPS
CE> header SimilarToNames ToCc =~ /\b([a-z][a-z])[^@,<>\(\)
CE> ]{0,20}(@[-a-z0-9_\.]{2,4}).{0,80}?(?:\1[^@,<>\(\) ]{0,20}\2.{0,80}?){2,}/is
I use this:
# This is a reformulation of standard test VERY_SUSP_RECIPS
header SimilarToNames ToCc =~ /\b([a-z][a-z])[^@,<>\(\)
]{0,20}(@[-a-z0-9_\.]{2,4}).{0,80}?(?:\1[^@,<>\(\) ]{0,20}\2.{0,80}?){2,}/is
describeSimilarToNames To: and Cc: contain similar
use
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:25:16PM +, Chris Willard wrote:
> Is there a Perl expression that I can use that would count if the
> number of "chris@" is greater than a given value (e.g. 3)?
Actually 9 entries (the first, plus 8 others). You could use a similar
RE to the SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS one.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 7:47:04 PM, you wrote:
TVD> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:20:36PM +, Chris Willard wrote:
>> There is very little text in the messages so they are missed by
>> spamassassin. Is there a rule that I can use to spot when messages are
>> addressed like this?
TVD> You me
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:20:36PM +, Chris Willard wrote:
> There is very little text in the messages so they are missed by
> spamassassin. Is there a rule that I can use to spot when messages are
> addressed like this?
You mean something like SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS? :)
--
Randomly Generated Tag
Hi All,
I keep getting spam that sends to multiple address in the form;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc.
There is very little text in the messages so they are missed by
spamassassin. Is there a rule that I can use to spot when messages are
addressed like this?
--
Re
